Home  ›  What factors contributed to economic globalization during the twentieth century?

What factors contributed to economic globalization during the twentieth century?

Written By Thursday, April 7, 2022 Add Comment Edit

International economic interdependence

Economic globalization is one of the three main dimensions of globalization commonly found in academic literature, with the two others being political globalization and cultural globalization, as well as the general term of globalization.[1] Economic globalization refers to the widespread international motion of appurtenances, capital, services, engineering and information. It is the increasing economic integration and interdependence of national, regional, and local economies across the world through an intensification of cross-edge movement of appurtenances, services, technologies and capital.[2] Economic globalization primarily comprises the globalization of production, finance, markets, engineering science, organizational regimes, institutions, corporations, and people.[3]

While economical globalization has been expanding since the emergence of trans-national merchandise, information technology has grown at an increased rate due to improvements in the efficiency of long-distance transportation, advances in telecommunications, the importance of information rather than physical uppercase in the mod economy, and past developments in science and technology.[four] The rate of globalization has likewise increased under the framework of the General Understanding on Tariffs and Trade and the Globe Trade Organization, in which countries gradually cutting down merchandise barriers and opened up their current accounts and capital accounts.[iv] This recent nail has been largely supported past adult economies integrating with developing countries through foreign directly investment, lowering costs of doing business, the reduction of trade barriers, and in many cases cross-border migration.

Evolution of globalization [edit]

History [edit]

International commodity markets, labor markets, and capital markets brand up the economy and define economic globalization.[5]

First as early equally 6500 BCE, people in Syrian arab republic were trading livestock, tools, and other items. In Sumer, an early civilization in Mesopotamia, a token system was 1 of the first forms of article money. Labor markets consist of workers, employers, wages, income, supply and demand. Labor markets have been effectually as long equally article markets. The first labor markets provided workers to grow crops and tend livestock for subsequently auction in local markets. Capital markets emerged in industries that require resources beyond those of an individual farmer.[half dozen]

Engineering [edit]

Globalization is nearly interconnecting people around the earth across the concrete barrier of geographical boundaries.[7]

These advances in economic globalization were disrupted by World War I. Most of the global economic powers constructed protectionist economic policies and introduced trade barriers that slowed trade growth to the point of stagnation.[8] This caused a slowing of worldwide merchandise and fifty-fifty led to other countries introducing clearing caps. Globalization did not fully resume until the 1970s, when governments began to emphasize the benefits of trade.[9] Today, follow-on advances in engineering take led to the rapid expansion of global trade.[10]

Three suggested factors accelerated economic globalization: advancement of scientific discipline and applied science, market place oriented economic reforms, and contributions by multinational corporations.[9] [eleven]

The 1956 invention of containerized shipping, along with increases in ship sizes, were a major part of the reduction in shipping costs.[12] [xiii]

Policy and government [edit]

The GATT/WTO framework, which was initiated in 1947,[xiv] led participating countries to reduce their tariff and non-tariff barriers to merchandise. Indeed, the thought of Most Favoured Nation was essential to the GATT.[15] [16] In club to accede, governments had to shift their economies from central planning to market driven, especially subsequently the fall of the Soviet Union.[17] [eighteen]

On 27 October 1986, the London Stock Exchange enacted newly deregulated rules that enabled global interconnection of markets, with an expectation of huge increases in market activeness. This event came to exist known as the Big Bang.

Past the time the Globe Merchandise Organization was established in 1994 equally the baton was passed from the GATT,[14] it had grown to 128 countries, including Czech Republic, Slovakia and Slovenia. The twelvemonth 1995 saw the WTO laissez passer the General Understanding on Trade in Services, while the 1998 defeat of the OECD's Multilateral Agreement on Investment was a hiccup on the road to economic globalization.

Multinational corporations reorganized production to take reward of these opportunities. Labor-intensive product migrated to areas with lower labor costs,[19] especially People's republic of china,[20] later followed by other functions as skill levels increased. Networks raised the level of wealth consumption and geographical mobility. This highly dynamic worldwide arrangement had powerful ramifications.[21] The World Trade System Ministerial Conference of 1999 and associated 1999 Seattle WTO protests were a significant step on the road to economical globalization.[22]

The People's Republic of Mainland china (2001) and the concluding remnants of ex-Soviet bloc countries similar Ukraine (2008) and Russia (2012) were admitted much after to the WTO process afterward painful structural reforms.

The Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Forestall Base Erosion and Profit Shifting, which entered into force on i July 2018, is an effort to harmonize tax regimes in lodge to prevent multi-national firms from taking reward of loopholes like Ireland's Green Jersey BEPS tool.

Global actors [edit]

International governmental organizations [edit]

An intergovernmental organization or international governmental organization (IGO) refers to an entity created by treaty, involving 2 or more nations, to work in good organized religion, on issues of common interest. IGO's strive for peace, security and deal with economic and social questions.[v] Examples include: The United Nations, The World Bank and on a regional level The North Atlantic Treaty Organization amongst others.

International non-governmental organizations (NGOs) [edit]

International not-governmental organizations include charities, non-profit advancement groups, concern associations, and cultural associations. International charitable activities increased subsequently World State of war Two and on the whole NGOs provide more economical assist to developing countries than developed country governments.

Businesses [edit]

Since the 1970s, multinational businesses have increasingly relied on outsourcing and subcontracting across vast geographical spaces, every bit supply chains are global and intermediate products are produced. Firms also engage in inter-firm alliances and rely on foreign inquiry and development. This in dissimilarity to past periods where firms kept production internalized or inside a localized geography. Innovations in communications and transportation engineering, as well as greater economic openness and less government intervention accept fabricated a shift away from internalization more feasible.[23] Additionally, businesses going global learn the tools to effectively interact in a culturally active fashion with people of many diverse cultural backgrounds.[24]

Migrants [edit]

International migrants transfer significant amounts of money through remittances to lower-income relatives. Communities of migrants in the destination land often provide new arrivals with information and ideas nearly how to earn money. In some cases, this has resulted in disproportionately high representation of some ethnic groups in certain industries, especially if economy success encourages more people to motion from the source country. Movement of people also spreads applied science and aspects of business organization culture, and moves accumulated fiscal assets.

Impact [edit]

Economic growth and poverty reduction [edit]

Economic growth accelerated and poverty declined globally following the acceleration of globalization.

Per capita Gdp growth in the post-1980 globalizers accelerated from ane.4 pct a yr in the 1960s and 2.9 percent a year in the 1970s to 3.5 percent in the 1980s and 5.0 percent in the 1990s. This acceleration in growth is even more remarkable given that the rich countries saw steady declines in growth from a loftier of 4.7 per centum in the 1960s to 2.ii pct in the 1990s. Also, the non-globalizing developing countries did much worse than the globalizers, with the former's annual growth rates falling from highs of three.iii percent during the 1970s to only 1.4 percent during the 1990s. This rapid growth amongst the globalizers is not simply due to the strong performances of China and Bharat in the 1980s and 1990s—18 out of the 24 globalizers experienced increases in growth, many of them quite substantial."[25]

Growth Charge per unit of Real Gross domestic product per capita

According to the International Budgetary Fund, growth benefits of economical globalization are widely shared. While several globalizers have seen an increase in inequality, most notably China, this increment in inequality is a outcome of domestic liberalization, restrictions on internal migration, and agricultural policies, rather than a result of international trade.[25]

Poverty has been reduced as evidenced by a 5.four percent annual growth in income for the poorest fifth of the population of Malaysia. Even in Prc, where inequality continues to exist a problem, the poorest 5th of the population saw a three.8 per centum annual growth in income. In several countries, those living beneath the dollar-per-day poverty threshold declined. In Prc, the rate declined from 20 to fifteen percent and in Bangladesh the rate dropped from 43 to 36 percent.[ citation needed ] [ when? ]

Globalizers are narrowing the per capita income gap between the rich and the globalizing nations. China, India, and People's republic of bangladesh, some of the newly industrialised nations in the world, have profoundly narrowed inequality due to their economical expansion.[25]

Global supply chain [edit]

The global supply concatenation consists of complex interconnected networks that allow companies to produce handle and distribute diverse goods and services to the public worldwide.

Corporations manage their supply chain to take reward of cheaper costs of product. A supply chain is a system of organizations, people, activities, information, and resources involved in moving a product or service from supplier to client. Supply chain activities involve the transformation of natural resources, raw materials, and components into a finished product that is delivered to the end customer.[26] Supply chains link value bondage.[27] Supply and demand can be very fickle, depending on factors such as the weather, consumer demand, and large orders placed by multinational corporations.[28]

Labor conditions and environment [edit]

"Race to the bottom" [edit]

Globalization is sometimes perceived as a crusade of a phenomenon called the "race to the bottom" that implies that to minimize cost and increment delivery speed, businesses tend to locate operations in countries with the least stringent ecology and labor regulations. Force per unit area to practice this is increased if competitors lower costs by the same means. This both direct results poor working conditions, low wages, task insecurity, and pollution, but also encourages governments to under-regulate in lodge to attract jobs and economic investment.[12] Nonetheless, if business organization demand is sufficiently loftier, the labor pool in depression-wage countries becomes exhausted (as has happened in the Mainland china),[six] resulting in higher wages due to competition, and more demand from the public for regime protection confronting exploitation and pollution. From 2003 to 2013, wages in China and India take gone up by effectually 10–20% a year.[29]

Wellness risks [edit]

In developing countries with loose labor regulations, there are adverse health consequences from working long hours and individuals that brunt themselves from working within vasts global supply chains.[30] Women in agriculture, for example, are often asked to work long hours handling chemicals such as pesticides and fertilizers without any protection.[28]

Although both men and women experience shortcomings with health, the final reports stated that women, with the double burden of domestic and paid work experience an increased the risk of psychological distress and suboptimal health. Strazdins concluded that negative work-family unit spillover peculiarly is associated with wellness issues among both women and men, and negative family-work spillover is related to a poorer health status among women."[31]

It is common for the work lifestyle to bring forth adverse health atmospheric condition or even death due to weak prophylactic measure policies. After the tragic collapse of the Rana Plaza factory in Bangladesh where over 800 deaths occurred the country has since then made efforts in boosting up their safety policies to amend accommodate workers.[32]

Mistreatment [edit]

In developing countries with loose labor regulations and a large supply of low-skill, low-cost workers, in that location are risks for mistreatment of some workers, specially women and children.[33] Poor working conditions and sexual harassment are just some of the mistreatment faced by women in the textile supply chain. Marina Prieto-Carrón shows in her research in Primal America that women in sweatshops are not fifty-fifty supplied with toilet newspaper in the bathroom every day. The reason it costs corporations more is because people tin not work to their full potential in poor conditions, affecting the global marketplace.[34] Furthermore, when corporations decide to change manufacturing rates or locations in industries that employ more women, they are often left with no job nor assistance. This kind of sudden reduction or emptying in hours is seen in industries such as the textile industry and agronomics industry, both of which employ a higher number of women than men.[28] One solution to mistreatment of women in the supply concatenation is more than interest from the corporation and trying to regulate the outsourcing of their production.[33]

Global labor and off-white trade movements [edit]

Several movements, such as the fair trade motility and the anti-sweatshop movement, claim to promote a more socially just global economy. The fair merchandise movement works towards improving trade, development and product for disadvantaged producers. The fair trade movement has reached i.6 billion US dollars in annual sales.[9] The movement works to raise consumer awareness of exploitation of developing countries. Fair trade works under the motto of "trade, not assist", to improve the quality of life for farmers and merchants by participating in direct sales, providing better prices and supporting the community.[x] Meanwhile, the anti-sweatshop movement is to protest the unfair treatment acquired by some companies.

Diverse transnational organizations abet for improved labor standards in developing countries. This including labor unions, who are put at a negotiating disadvantage when an employer can relocate or outsource operations to a dissimilar country.[35]

Capital letter flight [edit]

The Argentine economic crisis of 2001 acquired in a currency devaluation and upper-case letter flight which resulted in a sharp drop in imports.

Capital flight occurs when avails or money rapidly flow out of a land because of that state's contempo increase in unfavorable financial weather condition such as taxes, tariffs, labor costs, authorities debt or capital controls. This is ordinarily accompanied by a sharp drop in the substitution rate of the afflicted land or a forced devaluation for countries living under fixed commutation rates. Currency declines improve the terms of trade, only reduce the budgetary value of financial and other avails in the land. This leads to decreases in the purchasing power of the country'due south assets.

A 2008 paper published past Global Fiscal Integrity estimated upper-case letter flight to be leaving developing countries at the rate of "$850 billion to $1 trillion a year."[36] Merely majuscule flying also affects developed countries. A 2009 article in The Times reported that hundreds of wealthy financiers and entrepreneurs had recently fled the Britain in response to recent tax increases, relocating to depression tax destinations such as Jersey, Guernsey, the Isle of mann and the British Virgin Islands.[37] In May 2012 the calibration of Greek capital flying in the wake of the first "undecided" legislative election was estimated at €4 billion a calendar week.[38]

Uppercase flight tin cause liquidity crises in straight affected countries and tin crusade related difficulties in other countries involved in international commerce such equally shipping and finance. Asset holders may be forced into distress sales. Borrowers typically face college loan costs and collateral requirements, compared to periods of ample liquidity, and unsecured debt is almost impossible to obtain. Typically, during a liquidity crisis, the interbank lending marketplace stalls.

Inequality [edit]

While inside-country income inequality has increased throughout the globalization menses, globally inequality has lessened as developing countries have experienced much more rapid growth.[39] Economical inequality varies between societies, historical periods, economical structures or economic systems, ongoing or past wars, between genders, and between differences in individuals' abilities to create wealth.[40] Amid the various numerical indices for measuring economic inequality, the Gini coefficient is about oftentimes-cited.

Of the factors influencing the duration of economic growth in both adult and developing countries, income equality has a more benign effect than merchandise openness, audio political institutions, and foreign investment.[41]

Economical inequality includes equity, equality of outcome and subsequent equality of opportunity. Although earlier studies considered economic inequality as necessary and beneficial,[42] some economists see it equally an important social problem.[43] Early on studies suggesting that greater equality inhibits economic growth did not account for lags between inequality changes and growth changes.[44] Later studies claimed that i of the most robust determinants of sustained economic growth is the level of income inequality.[41]

International inequality is inequality betwixt countries. Income differences betwixt rich and poor countries are very large, although they are changing apace. Per capita incomes in China and India doubled in the prior twenty years, a feat that required 150 years in the US.[45] Co-ordinate to the United Nations Human Evolution Report for 2013, for countries at varying levels of the UN Man Development Index the GNP per capita grew betwixt 2004 and 2013 from 24,806 to 33,391 or 35% (very high human development), 4,269 to 5,428 or 27% (medium) and 1,184 to 1,633 or 38% (low) PPP$, respectively (PPP$ = purchasing power parity measured in United states dollars).[46]

Certain demographic changes in the developing world after agile economical liberalization and international integration resulted in rising welfare and hence, reduced inequality. According to Martin Wolf, in the developing earth as a whole, life expectancy rose by four months each twelvemonth later on 1970 and babe mortality rate declined from 107 per thousand in 1970 to 58 in 2000 due to improvements in standards of living and health weather. Also, adult literacy in developing countries rose from 53% in 1970 to 74% in 1998 and much lower illiteracy charge per unit among the young guarantees that rates will keep to fall as fourth dimension passes. Furthermore, the reduction in fertility rates in the developing world equally a whole from 4.1 births per woman in 1980 to ii.viii in 2000 indicates improved education level of women on fertility, and control of fewer children with more parental attending and investment.[47] Consequentially, more than prosperous and educated parents with fewer children have chosen to withdraw their children from the labor force to give them opportunities to be educated at school improving the effect of child labor. Thus, despite seemingly unequal distribution of income within these developing countries, their economical growth and development have brought nearly improved standards of living and welfare for the population as a whole.

Economic development spurred by international investment or trade tin can increase local income inequality equally workers with more than educational activity and skills can find college-paying work. This can be mitigated with government funding of didactics.[6] Another way globalization increases income inequality is by increasing the size of the market bachelor for any particular good or service. This allows the owners of companies that service global markets to reap unduly larger profits. This may happen at the expense of local companies that would accept otherwise been able to boss the domestic market, which would accept spread profits around to a larger number of owners. On the other hand, globalized stock markets let more people to invest internationally, and become a share of profits from companies they otherwise could not.

Resources insecurity [edit]

A video explaining findings of the report "Water, energy and state insecurity in global supply chains"

A systematic, and possibly first large-scale, cross-sectoral assay of water, energy and state in security in 189 countries that links national and sector consumption to sources showed that countries and sectors are highly exposed to over-exploited, insecure, and degraded such resources. The 2020 study finds that economic globalization has decreased security of global supply chains with most countries exhibiting greater exposure to resource risks via international trade – mainly from remote production sources – and that diversifying trading partners is unlikely to help nations and sectors to reduce these or to better their resource cocky-sufficiency.[48] [49] [fifty] [51]

Competitive advantages [edit]

Businesses in adult countries tend to be more highly automated, have more sophisticated technology and techniques, and have better national infrastructure. For these reasons and sometimes due to economies of calibration, they tin can sometimes out-compete similar businesses in developing countries. This is a substantial upshot in international agronomics, where Western farms tend to be large and highly productive due to agricultural machinery, fertilizer, and pesticides; but developing-country farms tend to exist smaller and rely heavily on manual labor. Conversely, cheaper manual labor in developing countries immune workers at that place to out-compete workers in higher-wage countries for jobs in labor-intensive industries. As the theory of competitive advantage predicts, instead of each country producing all the goods and services it needs domestically, a country's economic system tends to specialize in certain areas where it is more productive (though in the long term the differences may be equalized, resulting in a more balanced economy).

Tax havens [edit]

The ratio of High german assets in tax havens in relation to the total German language Gross domestic product.[52] The "Big 7" shown are Hong Kong, Ireland, Lebanon, Liberia, Panama, Singapore, and Switzerland.

A tax haven is a state, state or territory where certain taxes are levied at a low rate or not at all, which are used past businesses for tax abstention and taxation evasion.[53] Individuals and/or corporate entities can discover it attractive to move themselves to areas with reduced taxation. This creates a state of affairs of taxation competition among governments. Taxes vary substantially across jurisdictions.[54] Sovereign states have theoretically unlimited powers to enact tax laws affecting their territories, unless limited past previous international treaties. The primal feature of a taxation oasis is that its laws and other measures can be used to evade or avoid the tax laws or regulations of other jurisdictions.[55] In its Dec 2008 report on the apply of tax havens by American corporations,[56] the U.S. Regime Accountability Function regarded the post-obit characteristics as indicative of a taxation haven: naught or nominal taxes; lack of effective substitution of revenue enhancement data with foreign revenue enhancement authorities; lack of transparency in the operation of legislative, legal or authoritative provisions; no requirement for a substantive local presence; and self-promotion equally an offshore financial center.

A 2012 written report from the Tax Justice Network estimated that between United states of america$21 trillion and $32 trillion is sheltered from taxes in tax havens worldwide.[57] If such subconscious offshore avails are considered, many countries with governments nominally in debt would be net creditor nations.[58] Notwithstanding, the tax policy director of the Chartered Institute of Taxation expressed skepticism over the accuracy of the figures.[59] Daniel J. Mitchell of the United states-based Cato Plant says that the written report also assumes, when because notional lost taxation revenue, that 100% of the coin deposited offshore is evading payment of tax.[60]

The tax shelter benefits result in a tax incidence disadvantaging the poor.[61] Many revenue enhancement havens are thought to take connections to "fraud, money laundering and terrorism."[62] Accountants' opinions on the propriety of tax havens have been evolving,[63] every bit have the opinions of their corporate users,[64] governments,[65] [66] and politicians,[67] [68] although their use by Fortune 500 companies[69] and others remains widespread. Reform proposals centering on the Big Four accountancy firms have been avant-garde.[70] Some governments appear to be using estimator spyware to scrutinize corporations' finances.[71]

Red: U.Southward. corporate profits after tax. Blue: U.S. nonresidential business organization investment, both as fractions of GDP, 1989–2012. Wealth concentration of corporate profits in global taxation havens due to tax avoidance spurred by imposition of austerity measures tin can stall investment, inhibiting further growth.[72]

Cultural effects [edit]

Economical globalization may affect civilisation. Populations may mimic the international flow of capital and labor markets in the form of clearing and the merger of cultures. Foreign resource and economical measures may impact different native cultures and may cause assimilation of a native people.[73] As these populations are exposed to the English language linguistic communication, computers, western music, and North American civilisation, changes are being noted in shrinking family size, immigration to larger cities, more coincidental dating practices, and gender roles are transformed.

Yu Xintian noted 2 contrary trends in civilisation due to economical globalization.[74] Yu argued that civilisation and manufacture not only flow from the developed globe to the balance, just trigger an endeavour to protect local cultures. He notes that economic globalization began after World War II, whereas internationalization began over a century ago.[75]

George Ritzer wrote almost the McDonaldization of society and how fast food businesses spread throughout the Usa and the rest of the world, attracting other places to prefer fast food civilisation.[76] Ritzer describes other businesses such as The Trunk Shop, a British cosmetics company, that have copied McDonald's business model for expansion and influence. In 2006, 233 of 280 or over 80% of new McDonald's opened outside the US. In 2007, Nippon had 2,828 McDonald's locations.[77]

Global media companies export information effectually the world. This creates a mostly one-way period of information, and exposure to more often than not western products and values. Companies like CNN, Reuters and the BBC dominate the global airwaves with western points of view. Other media news companies such as Qatar's Al Jazeera network offer a different signal of view, simply reach and influence fewer people.[78]

Migration [edit]

"With an estimated 210 million people living outside their state of origin (International Labour System [ILO] 2010), international migration has touched the lives of almost everyone in both the sending and receiving countries of the Global S and the Global N".[79] Because of advances made in engineering science, human being beings also as goods are able to move through different countries and regions with relative ease.

Run into besides [edit]

  • Economic union
  • Strange direct investment
  • Costless merchandise
  • Globalization
  • Internationalization
  • Jihad vs. McWorld
  • List of economical communities
  • List of costless trade agreements
  • Military globalization
  • Mundialization
  • Neoliberalism
  • Trade globalization
  • Globe economy

Notes [edit]

  1. ^ Babones, Salvatore (15 Apr 2008). "Studying Globalization: Methodological Bug". In George Ritzer (ed.). The Blackwell Companion to Globalization. John Wiley & Sons. p. 146. ISBN978-0-470-76642-2.
  2. ^ Joshi, Rakesh Mohan (2009). International Business. Oxford Academy Press, Incorporated. ISBN978-0-19-568909-nine.
  3. ^ James et al., vols. 1–4 (2007)
  4. ^ a b Gao 2000, p. 4.
  5. ^ a b "Intergovernmental Organizations (IGOs)". Harvard Law School . Retrieved 12 June 2020.
  6. ^ a b c Mohr, Angie. "The Effects of Economic Globalization on Developing Countries". Demand Media.
  7. ^ [Sumaira Aman 2017].
  8. ^ CEPAL 2002, p. 105. sfn error: no target: CITEREFCEPAL2002 (assistance)
  9. ^ a b c Raynolds, Murray & Wilkinson 2007, p. 3.
  10. ^ a b Raynolds, Murray & Wilkinson 2007, p. fifteen.
  11. ^ Thomas, Vladimir (1 May 2017). The world transformed 1945 to the present (Second ed.). Michael H.hunt. pp. 427–429.
  12. ^ a b Olney, W. W. (2013). "A race to the bottom? Employment protection and foreign direct investment." Periodical of International Economics, 91(2), 191–203.
  13. ^ Gao 2000.
  14. ^ a b "General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. Treaty data". Government of kingdom of the netherlands . Retrieved thirty December 2020.
  15. ^ Cebi, Pinar; Ludema, Rodney D. "The Rise and Fall of the Most-Favored-Nation Clause" (PDF). Office of Economics Working Paper. U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION (2002–06–B).
  16. ^ "MOST-FAVOURED NATION TREATMENT" (PDF). UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II. UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT. 2010.
  17. ^ Irwin, Douglas A. (November 2017). Clashing Over Commerce: A History of US Trade Policy. Academy of Chicago Press.
  18. ^ Irwin, Douglas A. (ix Apr 2007). "GATT Turns 60". Wall Street Periodical. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved 28 October 2017.
  19. ^ Elsby, Michael W. L.; Hobijn, Bart; Sahin, Aysegul (2013). "The Refuse of the U.South. Labor Share". Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, Working Paper Series: 01–45. doi:x.24148/wp2013-27.
  20. ^ Autor, David H.; Dorn, David; Hanson, Gordon H. (2013). "The China Syndrome: Local Labor Market place Effects of Import Competition in the Usa". American Economic Review. 103 (half dozen): 2121–2168. doi:ten.1257/aer.103.6.2121. S2CID 2498232.
  21. ^ Thomas, Vladimir (1 May 2017). The world transformed 1945 to the present (2d ed.). Michael H. Hunt. pp. 427–429.
  22. ^ Smith, Noah (6 Jan 2014). "The Night Side of Globalization: Why Seattle's 1999 Protesters Were Right". The Atlantic Monthly Group.
  23. ^ Brooks, Stephen G. (2005). Producing Security: Multinational Corporations, Globalization, and the Irresolute Calculus of Conflict. Princeton University Press. pp. 1–46. ISBN978-0-691-13031-half-dozen.
  24. ^ Caligiuri, Paula (2013). "Developing culturally active global concern leaders". Organizational Dynamics : A Quarterly Review of Organizational Behavior for Professional person Managers. Organizational dynamics : a quarterly review of organizational behavior for professional person managers. - New York, NY : Pergamon, Elsevier Science, ISSN 0090-2616, ZDB-ID 1930692. - Vol. 42.2013, 3, p. 175-182. 42 (3).
  25. ^ a b c Dollar, David; Kraay, Aart. "Merchandise, Growth, and Poverty". Finance and Evolution. International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 6 June 2011.
  26. ^ Kozlenkova, Irina V.; Hult, Yard. Tomas M.; Lund, Donald J.; Mena, Jeannette A.; Kekec, Pinar (12 May 2015). "The Office of Marketing Channels in Supply Chain Management". Journal of Retailing. 91 (iv): 586–609. doi:x.1016/j.jretai.2015.03.003. ISSN 0022-4359.
  27. ^ Anna., Nagurney (i January 2006). Supply concatenation network economic science : dynamics of prices, flows and profits. Edward Elgar Pub. ISBN978-1845429164. OCLC 317598837.
  28. ^ a b c Spieldoch, Alexandra (2007). "A Row to Hoe: The Gender Impact of Trade Liberalization on our Food Arrangement, Agricultural Markets and Women's Homo Rights". International Gender and Merchandise Network.
  29. ^ "Here, there and everywhere" (PDF). The Economist . Retrieved 30 Baronial 2019.
  30. ^ Pang, Tikki, and G. Emmanuel Guindon. "Globalization and Risks to Health." EMBO Reports.
  31. ^ Strazdins, Lyndall; Welsh, Jennifer; Korda, Rosemary; Broom, Dorothy; Paolucci, Francesco (2016). "Not all hours are equal: Could fourth dimension be a social determinant of health?". Sociology of Health & Illness. 38 (1): 21–42. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.12300. hdl:1885/109350. PMID 26174027.
  32. ^ Herlinger, Chris. "Bangladesh Counts The Human Cost of the Garment Industry. (Cover Story)." National Catholic Reporter 52.14 (2016): 1–16. Academic Search Premier. Web
  33. ^ a b Prieto-Carrón, Marina. "Is at that place Anyone Listening?: Women Workers in Factories in Key America, and Corporate Codes of Conduct." Development 47.three (2004): 101–05. ProQuest. Web.
  34. ^ Berik, M., and Y. Van Der Meulen Rodgers. "What's Macroeconomic Policy Got to Do with Gender Inequality? Testify from Asia." Global Social Policy 12.2 (2012): 183–89. Web
  35. ^ Beladi, Hamid; Chao, Chi-Chur; Hollas, Daniel (ane June 2013). "Does globalization weaken labor unions in developing countries?". The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development. 22 (4): 562–71. doi:x.1080/09638199.2011.578752. ISSN 0963-8199. S2CID 153712681.
  36. ^ "Illicit Financial Flows From Developing Countries: 2002–2006, Dev Kar and Devon Cartwright-Smith, 2008" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on xix October 2016. Retrieved 22 April 2013.
  37. ^ Hundreds of bosses abscond United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland over l% tax, The Times, xiii December 2009
  38. ^ Greek Euro exit looms closer equally banks crumble
  39. ^ Milanovic, B. (2012). Global Income Inequality by the Numbers: In History and Now – An Overview. Policy Research Working Papers (Report). CiteSeerX10.1.1.691.2382. doi:10.1596/1813-9450-6259.
  40. ^ Kopczuk, Saez, and Vocal find that "most of the increase in the variance of (log) almanac earnings is due to increases in the variance of (log) permanent earnings with modest increases in the variance of transitory (log) earnings." Thus, in fact, the increase in earnings inequality is in lifetime income. Furthermore, they notice that it remains hard for men to motion up the earnings distribution, while women fare better. Kopczuk, Wojciech (2010). "Earnings Inequality and Mobility in the United States: Prove from Social Security Data since 1937 *". Quarterly Journal of Economics. 125 (1): 91–128. doi:10.1162/qjec.2010.125.i.91. S2CID 13073651.
  41. ^ a b Berg, Andrew G.; Ostry, Jonathan D. (2011). "Equality and Efficiency". Finance and Development. 48 (3). Retrieved ten September 2012.
  42. ^ U.Due south. Income Inequality: It's Not So Bad By Thomas A. Garrett| Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis| Spring 2010
  43. ^ Wilkinson, Richard; Pickett, Kate (2009). The Spirit Level: Why More than Equal Societies Almost Always Practice Ameliorate. Allen Lane. p. 352. ISBN978-1-84614-039-6.
  44. ^ Banerjee, Abhijit 5.; Duflo, Esther (2003). "Inequality And Growth: What Can The Information Say?". Journal of Economical Growth. 8 (3): 267–99. doi:10.1023/A:1026205114860. Retrieved 25 September 2012.
  45. ^ UNDP 2013, Introduction.
  46. ^ UNDP 2013, p. 25.
  47. ^ Wolf, Martin (2004). "Why Globalization Works". Yale University Press. Archived from the original on 10 May 2013. Retrieved 6 April 2013.
  48. ^ "Global trade linked to resources insecurity". Cosmos Magazine. 26 October 2020. Retrieved 3 December 2020.
  49. ^ Dunphy, Siobhán (20 November 2020). "Is globalisation uniform with sustainable and resilient supply bondage?". European Scientist . Retrieved 3 Dec 2020.
  50. ^ "Globalized economy making h2o, energy and land insecurity worse: report". phys.org . Retrieved three Dec 2020.
  51. ^ Taherzadeh, Oliver; Bithell, Mike; Richards, Keith (28 October 2020). "H2o, energy and land insecurity in global supply chains". Global Environmental Change: 102158. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102158. ISSN 0959-3780. Retrieved 3 Dec 2020.
  52. ^ Shafik Hebous (2011) "Coin at the Docks of Tax Havens: A Guide", CESifo Working Paper Serial No. 3587, p. ix
  53. ^ Dharmapala, Dhammika und Hines Jr., James R. (2006) Which Countries Get Tax Havens?
  54. ^ Moran Harari, Markus Meinzer and Richard Murphy (October 2012) "Financial Secrecy, Banks and the Big iv Firms of Accountants" Archived 7 Apr 2016 at the Wayback Machine Tax Justice Network
  55. ^ "The Truth Near Tax Havens – retrieved 28 December 2007" (PDF) . Retrieved 22 March 2011.
  56. ^ "International Taxation: Large U.S. Corporations and Federal Contractors with Subsidiaries in Jurisdictions Listed every bit Tax Havens or Financial Privacy Jurisdictions GAO:GAO-09-157" (GAO-09-157). Government Accountability Part. eighteen December 2008. Retrieved 21 January 2009.
  57. ^ Tax Justice Network (22 July 2012) "Revealed: Global super-rich has at least $21 trillion hidden in hugger-mugger tax havens"
  58. ^ Canadian Broadcasting Co. (22 July 2012) "Wealthy hiding $21 trillion in taxation havens, study says"
  59. ^ John Whiting, tax policy managing director at the Britain'south Chartered Found of Taxation commented "In that location clearly are some significant amounts hidden away, but if it really is that size what is beingness done with it all?" and "If the proffer is that such amounts are actively subconscious and never accessed, that seems odd – not least in terms of what the tax authorities are doing. In fact, the US, United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland and German authorities are doing a lot", and noting that if the figures were accurate "you lot would await the havens to exist more conspicuously wealthy than they are". Even so, he also admitted that "I cannot disprove the figures at all, but they exercise seem staggering" "Revenue enhancement havens: Super-rich 'hiding' at least $21tn". BBC News. 22 July 2012. Retrieved iii October 2012.
  60. ^ "Fighting Anti-Tax Haven Demagoguery on CNN". 30 July 2012. Archived from the original on 27 December 2013. Retrieved 3 Oct 2012.
  61. ^ "Picking Up the Tab" U.S. Public Involvement Research Group, April 2012
  62. ^ "These Islands Aren't Just a Shelter From Taxes" New York Times, 5 May 2012
  63. ^ "Tax abstention: off-white or foul?" Archived 27 May 2013 at the Wayback Machine Accountancy Age Debates, 14 January 2013
  64. ^ "Google volition not oppose clampdown on tax avoidance, chairman says" Guardian, 28 January 2013
  65. ^ "Tax abstention isn't a left or right issue, it's a cancer eating our republic" New Statesman, 21 June 2012
  66. ^ "Helsinki Boycotts Tax Havens", Inter Press Service, 6 Oct 2012
  67. ^ "David Cameron: Tax fugitive foreign firms like Starbucks and Amazon lack 'moral scruples'" The Telegraph, 4 January 2013
  68. ^ "Germany'south Merkel calls for G8 fight against revenue enhancement havens" Reuters, 13 Feb 2013
  69. ^ "Which Fortune 500 Companies Are Sheltering Income in Overseas Tax Havens?" Archived 24 April 2013 at the Wayback Automobile Citizens for Tax Justice, 17 October 2012
  70. ^ "United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland could end these tax scams by hitting the big 4" The Guardian, 10 Dec 2012
  71. ^ "Did the Bounds of Cyber State of war But Expand to Banks and Neutral States?" The Atlantic, 17 August 2012
  72. ^ "Amass Demand, Instability and Growth" Review of Keynesian Economics, Jan 2013 (see also this review of the paper)
  73. ^ Held, David, ed. (2004). A Globalizing World?: Culture, Economics, Politics (2nd ed.). London; New York: Routledge, in association with the Open up Academy. p. 84. ISBN978-0-203-39219-5.
  74. ^ Yu, Xintian (2002). Cultural Impact on International Relations. Chinese Philosophical Studies, XX. The Quango for Research in Values and Philosophy. p. 203. ISBN978-1-56518-176-2.
  75. ^ Xintian, Yu (2002). Cultural Impact on International Relations. Chinese Philosophical Studies, Xx. The Quango for Research in Values and Philosophy. p. 204. ISBN978-1-56518-176-2.
  76. ^ Ritzer, George (2010). McDonaldization: the reader/ tertiary ed. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage Publications. p. 3. ISBN978-ane-4129-7582-7.
  77. ^ Ritzer, George (2010). McDonaldization: the reader/ 3rd ed. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage Publications. pp. v–vii. ISBN978-1-4129-7582-7.
  78. ^ Nakayma, Thomas, G (4 January 2011). The Handbook of Critical Intercultural communication. Blackwell. ISBN978-one-4051-8407-six.
  79. ^ Benería, Lourdes (2012). "Gender and International Migration: Globalization, Evolution, and Governance". Feminist Economic science. 18 (ii): ane–33. doi:10.1080/13545701.2012.688998. S2CID 144565818.

References [edit]

  • Gao, Shangquan (2000). "Economic Globalization: Trends, Risks and Hazard Prevention: 2000" (PDF).
  • Bordo, Michael D.; Taylor, Alan M.; Williamson, Jeffrey K. (ane November 2007). Globalization in Historical Perspective. University of Chicago Press. ISBN978-0-226-06599-1.
  • Held, David, ed. (2004). A Globalizing Globe?: Civilization, Economics, Politics (2nd ed.). London; New York: Routledge, in association with the Open University.
  • James, Paul; Gills, Barry (2007). Globalization and Economy, Vol. one: Global Markets and Capitalism. London: Sage Publications.
  • James, Paul; Patomäki, Heikki (2007). Globalization and Economy, Vol. 2: Global Finance and the New Global Economy. London: Sage Publications.
  • James, Paul; Palen, Ronen (2007). Globalization and Economy, Vol. 3: Global Economical Regimes and Institutions. London: Sage Publications.
  • James, Paul; O'Brien, Robert (2007). Globalization and Economy, Vol. 4: Globalizing Labour. London: Sage Publications.
  • Raynolds, Laura T.; Murray, Douglas; Wilkinson, John (11 June 2007). Fair Trade: The Challenges of Transforming Globalization. Routledge. ISBN978-one-134-00263-four.
  • UNDP (2013). "Human Evolution Written report 2013 - The Rising of the Southward: Human Progress in a Diverse World" (PDF) . Retrieved 14 July 2014.
  • Eun, Cheol S.; Resnick, Bruce G. (2012). International Fiscal Direction. McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) and China Machine Press. ISBN978-0-07-803465-7.

External links [edit]

  • Media related to Economic globalization at Wikimedia Commons

newmantwours.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_globalization

0 Response to "What factors contributed to economic globalization during the twentieth century?"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel